#4 Accumulator physics... - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

#4 Accumulator physics...

The Golfing Machine - Advanced

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2012, 01:11 PM
HungryBear HungryBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
#4 Accumulator physics...
THRUST 6-C-1 #4 "wherever the straight Left Arm contacts the left side. And. The picture with caption "#4 Edged Arrow.

Preface; I have been thinking about shoulder turn and the above has always been problematic to me.

The general thought seems to be the left arm is "moved" by the contact point with the chest. My belief is the left arm (#4 accumulator when not in line with the shoulders) is accelerated axially by a pure pull and radially by change in angular velocity of the turning shoulders. The 6-c-1 presentation is not helpful to my construction. Any contact between the arm and chest is purely incidental and not necessary for proper actuation of #4 accumulator.

Other thoughts??

HB

Last edited by HungryBear : 06-14-2012 at 01:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-14-2012, 02:02 PM
MizunoJoe MizunoJoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 719
It's probably best to just think of #4 as pivot power. So however the pivot unloads it, whether a pure pull, a blast off, or a combo is correct.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-15-2012, 10:11 AM
HungryBear HungryBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
I started this thread because this is a precision alignment and any arbetrary flap about or misapplication is bad.
These are some of the facts/considerations that
have gone into my thought:

1. The shoulder turn is around the spine.

2. The "HEAD", not the head, is the stationary center of the swing. That would place the "HEAD" at the intersection of shoulders and spine. Everyones physical head is located slightly different.

3. #4 Accumulator is an angle. If it releases off the chest it has a release angle of about 1 degree. Other wise #4 release range is from Max. angle- about 45 deg to the shoulders - to min. angle - in line with shoulders- 180 deg.

5. A "chest launch" produces uncentered rotation. And is little more than a #1 pp "lite" slid up the arm.

6. I see many golfers who have a sternum center, most pro"s have it back at the spine, "HEAD"

7...X etc.

Discussion?

All is part of TGM but 6-C-1 #4, as presented, can be problematic for alignment??

HB

Last edited by HungryBear : 06-15-2012 at 11:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-15-2012, 12:01 PM
Etzwane Etzwane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 261
Originally Posted by HungryBear View Post
I started this thread because this is a precision alignment and any arbetrary flap about or misapplication is bad.
These are some of the facts/considerations that
have gone into my thought:

1. The shoulder turn is around the spine.

2. The "HEAD", not the head, is the stationary center of the swing. That would place the "HEAD" at the intersection of shoulders and spine. Everyones physical head is located slightly different.

3. #4 Accumulator is an angle. If it releases off the chest it has a release angle of about 1 degree. Other wise #4 release range is from Max. angle- about 45 deg to the shoulders - to min. angle - in line with shoulders- 180 deg.

5. A "chest launch" produces uncentered rotation. And is little more than a #1 pp "lite" slid up the arm.

6. I see many golfers who have a sternum center, most pro"s have it back at the spine, "HEAD"

7...X etc.

Discussion?

All is part of TGM but 6-C-1 #4, as presented, can be problematic for alignment??

HB
wrt 3, I see #4 angle as hands going from in front of right pectoral to in front pf the sternum when released.

wrt 5-6, the rotation is uncentered anyway as the center of the arc (shoulder) is located away from the center of the pivot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-15-2012, 12:34 PM
HungryBear HungryBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
Included info
Here is a well done thread. I find no need to re-do it.

http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/s...Max+%234+power

The author has his ME credentials from NIT mine are EE from NjIT but I do have a good ME background.

Please continue.

HB
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-15-2012, 01:44 PM
MizunoJoe MizunoJoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 719
Originally Posted by HungryBear View Post
I started this thread because this is a precision alignment and any arbetrary flap about or misapplication is bad.
These are some of the facts/considerations that
have gone into my thought:

1. The shoulder turn is around the spine.

Discussion?

HB
For starters, #1 is not true even for a rotated shoulder turn. The spine is on the outside of the body and gets thrown around by the shoulder turn, however flat or steep.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-15-2012, 02:27 PM
HungryBear HungryBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
Originally Posted by MizunoJoe View Post
For starters, #1 is not true even for a rotated shoulder turn. The spine is on the outside of the body and gets thrown around by the shoulder turn, however flat or steep.
2-H SHOULDER MOTION

p.2
"The spine, between the shoulders, is the center of the Shoulder Turn...."

HB

Last edited by HungryBear : 06-15-2012 at 02:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-15-2012, 04:15 PM
MizunoJoe MizunoJoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 719
Originally Posted by HungryBear View Post
2-H SHOULDER MOTION

p.2
"The spine, between the shoulders, is the center of the Shoulder Turn...."

HB
Yes, it says that, now reach up over your shoulder and put your middle finger on your spine and turn while keeping your head still - feel the finger move and look in a mirror and see it move. Now do it again but this time put your finger on your neck bone.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:19 PM
O.B.Left O.B.Left is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,433
Originally Posted by HungryBear View Post

5. A "chest launch" produces uncentered rotation. And is little more than a #1 pp "lite" slid up the arm.
Agreed on the head thing. Not sure what you mean by "pp #1 lite" why not just pp #4?

I don't want to get you stuck on this single point but doesn't the above "uncentered" rotation bring with it a critical acceleration multiplier? Let me explain my thinking and please tell me if my layman's logic is wrong mechanically.

I see it, the whole motion as a multiple levered system , with multiple centres therefore. Take the Downswing Sequence for instance , with its initial period of shoulder acceleration about the pivot centre (a place between the shoulders) followed by a period of (left) arm acceleration about the left shoulder . These two levers if you will are sequenced in initiation but overlap somewhat i.e. the left shoulder is still moving while the left arm is accelerating away from the chest via throw out or drive out. An uncentered motion yes but a powerful "blast off" as the left arm is now moving faster than mere pivot rotation would allow.

Also , in terms of mechanical advantage when the left arm (the upper portion of the primary lever ... the "primary lever" the thing we are really swinging or driving , our main concern in the hierarchy of levers) lies across the chest in Startdown (the period of shoulder acceleration) the radius in question is one that extends from the pivot centre. Not from the left shoulder! Making the radius effectively about a half a left arm shorter and therefore theoretically easier to turn with Pivot Power. #2 angle shortens the radius length as well of course but the portion of left arm extending from the pivot centre is shorter too!

Sort of like bicycle gears in a way. Perhaps . Maybe. Small radius to large as you pick up speed. Each with a corresponding amount of drag . We ramp up speed by metering lag and drag. Some see it as being similar to the figure skater spin deal where the hands and arms are closer to the centre of rotation.... the longer radius upon arm extension slowing the pivot rotation . Whatever, the system requires a proper timing of the sequence to work properly. No amount of brute force will overcome the disadvantage of starting in 10th gear as opposed to 1st.

As an aside , this relates to the reason why I don't personally subscribe to the "keeping the arms packed" theory for full power shots anyways. Hold off's , low shots, fades, angled hinging, hook prevention etc ...... sure I'll do that, feel the "pack".

Trying to think of a mechanical model. How bout this kids propeller toy. Imagine the blades as being the shoulders , not the arms. Now imagine another even longer straight piece representing the left arm attached to the left shoulder propeller blade by a piece of string. Upon rotation would not the far end of the left arm piece move the fastest of any component? Uncentered though it is . Incidentally having a string like connection between left arm and left shoulder is a must for power transfer. Muscle tension at that connection is a silent killer..... if you ever lose power under stressful tournament conditions , or in cold weather, check your string connection. Need a big drive ... make sure its string like.
Attached Thumbnails:
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2012-06-16 at 12.33.24 PM.png
Views:	40
Size:	82.4 KB
ID:	2886  

Last edited by O.B.Left : 06-16-2012 at 03:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-16-2012, 05:47 PM
HungryBear HungryBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 759
Originally Posted by O.B.Left View Post
Agreed on the head thing. Not sure what you mean by "pp #1 lite" why not just pp #4?

I don't want to get you stuck on this single point but doesn't the above "uncentered" rotation bring with it a critical acceleration multiplier? Let me explain my thinking and please tell me if my layman's logic is wrong mechanically.

I see it, the whole motion as a multiple levered system , with multiple centres therefore. Take the Downswing Sequence for instance , with its initial period of shoulder acceleration about the pivot centre (a place between the shoulders) followed by a period of (left) arm acceleration about the left shoulder . These two levers if you will are sequenced in initiation but overlap somewhat i.e. the left shoulder is still moving while the left arm is accelerating away from the chest via throw out or drive out. An uncentered motion yes but a powerful "blast off" as the left arm is now moving faster than mere pivot rotation would allow.

Also , in terms of mechanical advantage when the left arm (the upper portion of the primary lever ... the "primary lever" the thing we are really swinging or driving , our main concern in the hierarchy of levers) lies across the chest in Startdown (the period of shoulder acceleration) the radius in question is one that extends from the pivot centre. Not from the left shoulder! Making the radius effectively about a half a left arm shorter and therefore theoretically easier to turn with Pivot Power. #2 angle shortens the radius length as well of course but the portion of left arm extending from the pivot centre is shorter too!

Sort of like bicycle gears in a way. Perhaps . Maybe. Small radius to large as you pick up speed. Each with a corresponding amount of drag . We ramp up speed by metering lag and drag. Some see it as being similar to the figure skater spin deal where the hands and arms are closer to the centre of rotation.... the longer radius upon arm extension slowing the pivot rotation . Whatever, the system requires a proper timing of the sequence to work properly. No amount of brute force will overcome the disadvantage of starting in 10th gear as opposed to 1st.

As an aside , this relates to the reason why I don't personally subscribe to the "keeping the arms packed" theory for full power shots anyways. Hold off's , low shots, fades, angled hinging, hook prevention etc ...... sure I'll do that, feel the "pack".

Trying to think of a mechanical model. How bout this kids propeller toy. Imagine the blades as being the shoulders , not the arms. Now imagine another even longer straight piece representing the left arm attached to the left shoulder propeller blade by a piece of string. Upon rotation would not the far end of the left arm piece move the fastest of any component? Uncentered though it is . Incidentally having a string like connection between left arm and left shoulder is a must for power transfer. Muscle tension at that connection is a silent killer..... if you ever lose power under stressful tournament conditions , or in cold weather, check your string connection. Need a big drive ... make sure its string like.
Lets see- kinda jumping around a-bit:

I have NO CLUE what "keeping the arms packed" is. I dont get out enough I guess.

The middle paragraphs- I am a BIG fan of the kenematic Sequence so all you say is all good.

The #1 lite comment- the left arm should be a string and to swing #4 pulls one end of this string. When one hits they push on #1 at the hands. If one "launches" off the chest then the left arm must be stiff and the pressure is pushing, not on the hands but way up above the bicept. Like a #1 pp "lite". Think about it, any real power will tear out your rotator cuff. and fold the arm. Which must be supported by right arm force. Might as well call it hitting.
Just let the left shoulder pull, club will fly out.

Another point, while i am typing. {This is a new point on why it is taught to "spin the flywheel" with the right shoulder} although the left shoulder pulls, because the right is 180* out it can be thought of as driving. That is good because only the right shoulder can be "aimed" downplain. So, the left shoulder can be moved in the correct direction because of right shoulder precision movement

Tee time- USGA- gota go

HB

Last edited by HungryBear : 06-17-2012 at 09:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.